Showing posts with label latina feminist thought. Show all posts
Showing posts with label latina feminist thought. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Latina Feminist Thought & Popular Culture

cross posted from my Media Justice column

This week I visited Ramapo College of New Jersey to give a presentation on Latina Feminist Thought for their Latino Heritage Month activities. My contacts at the Women’s Center had saw me speak at the CLPP Conference earlier this year, and when they contacted me earlier this semester I was really excited at working with them and their students.

When I think about a lecture/presentation/workshop on the topic of theories it kind of makes me anxious. Theory is something that can be so dense and boring, that I was happy to hear they would love for me to incorporate some aspect of popular culture in my presentation. When I first came to theory I was really intimidated! It was like learning another language to me and I felt dumb, especially when I didn’t know what some of the phrases or terms meant. It was a huge culture shock for me, but something that I was able to overcome and am now a part of creating and building theories and practices.

I had decided to discuss the evolution of Latina Feminist Thought over the past 5 decades in the United States for the purposes of time. Yet, I was struggling with how to incorporate the popular culture aspects. Finally, I decided that I would do two things: 1. Find films for each decade that were important to me in creating my own understanding and identity as a Latina and with a gendered lens, and 2. Include theorists who utilize various forms of media and art to create their theories and move the field of women, gender, Latin@, and ethnic studies forward.

I spent several weeks putting my thoughts together, and spent a good amount of time thinking about my own trajectory as a Latina “feminist” thinker. To be very honest, it was a difficult yet rewarding exercise. Sometimes we don’t often document why or how we come to a particular level of consciousness because when we shift our thinking or widen our lens we get distracted with the new knowledge. Reminding myself to write things down and spend time outlining how I came to certain ideas and understandings is something I still need to do (and encourage the rest of you to do the same especially if you are thinking of graduate school as it will help out a lot!).

Some of the media that I included in the presentation was poetry and how many Latin@s theorize their existence and experiences through poetry and other forms of creative writing. Also included were cartoons and artwork that have been created to share ideas and to make some theories and ideas more accessible in different ways for various communities. Then, of course I had more “traditional” forms of media such as films and the Internet.

What I created was a PowerPoint presentation that I’m really proud of completing. Not only was I proud to complete this in a PowerPoint format, since I’m such a dinosaur I rarely ever use this format, but I also had the opportunity to highlight amazing people in my community and whom I know personally and introduce their work to folks who have yet to hear of them. I included folks who are some of the foremothers of Latina Feminist thought (or using a gendered lens to examine and theorize about our lives and experiences), such as Gloria Anzaldúa, and Maxine Baca Zinn. I also introduced some of my amazing friends and media makers such as Erika Lopez, Sofia Quintero, and Ivan Velez, Jr. (interviews with them for the Media Makers Salon coming soon!). And yes, that’s right I had a whole discussion of including Latino men as being important to theorizing using a gendered lens. What I’m most proud of is to have had the opportunity to include youth media makers in the 2010 decade. I put Espie Hernandez, who was the first person I interviewed for the Media Makers Salon, and her documentary MARIPOSA. Espie’s film makes a really important connection between the topics that we are still discussing and needing to change as a community: gender roles and expectations, sexual orientation, gender expression, and Latino identity. Espie’s documentary and Anzaldúa’s work are in conversation with one another in amazing ways.

Prior to finishing my presentation, I outlined areas that I think Latina Feminist Thought will move towards and some areas that we still need to create spaces to discuss. Several of the conversations that I believe we need to be having and for whatever reason we are not, is including youth in theorizing their own experiences without having to have an adult “approve” or deem appropriate their narrative/testimonio. There was one theorist who I discussed that examines the Internet and how it is used to create activism and community (several reasons to support Net Neutrality), but who also sees several flaws in using the Internet for such work. I shared that this is one area that I find young people’s work being isolated and seen as less than exceptional which is not creating a space for future discussions with them. I also discussed including trans people of Color and examining how we create an atmosphere and environment that makes it difficult for trans people to live safely, share their ideas and experiences, and have the same rights we expect to have for ourselves.

Finally, I discussed how we could theorize about silence. I find that silence is something we are told is bad and negative and as Audre Lorde wrote “your silence will not protect you.” Yet, how is silence something that is very important and that represents us doing some really important and hard work? Let’s admit that thinking is hard work sometimes! Also, how can silence save some of our lives? Silence is very complicated and I think it needs to be examined more seriously and in a comprehensive way.

Below is the slide show that I compiled that you can check out and share if you’d like. I created a Latina Feminist Thought Tumblr page for folks to manage and submit anything they like to the page and encourage you to do the same!

This week I visited Ramapo College of New Jersey to give a presentation on Latina Feminist Thought for their Latino Heritage Month activities. My contacts at the Women’s Center had saw me speak at the CLPP Conference earlier this year, and when they contacted me earlier this semester I was really excited at working with them and their students.

When I think about a lecture/presentation/workshop on the topic of theories it kind of makes me anxious. Theory is something that can be so dense and boring, that I was happy to hear they would love for me to incorporate some aspect of popular culture in my presentation. When I first came to theory I was really intimidated! It was like learning another language to me and I felt dumb, especially when I didn’t know what some of the phrases or terms meant. It was a huge culture shock for me, but something that I was able to overcome and am now a part of creating and building theories and practices.

I had decided to discuss the evolution of Latina Feminist Thought over the past 5 decades in the United States for the purposes of time. Yet, I was struggling with how to incorporate the popular culture aspects. Finally, I decided that I would do two things: 1. Find films for each decade that were important to me in creating my own understanding and identity as a Latina and with a gendered lens, and 2. Include theorists who utilize various forms of media and art to create their theories and move the field of women, gender, Latin@, and ethnic studies forward.

I spent several weeks putting my thoughts together, and spent a good amount of time thinking about my own trajectory as a Latina “feminist” thinker. To be very honest, it was a difficult yet rewarding exercise. Sometimes we don’t often document why or how we come to a particular level of consciousness because when we shift our thinking or widen our lens we get distracted with the new knowledge. Reminding myself to write things down and spend time outlining how I came to certain ideas and understandings is something I still need to do (and encourage the rest of you to do the same especially if you are thinking of graduate school as it will help out a lot!).

Some of the media that I included in the presentation was poetry and how many Latin@s theorize their existence and experiences through poetry and other forms of creative writing. Also included were cartoons and artwork that have been created to share ideas and to make some theories and ideas more accessible in different ways for various communities. Then, of course I had more “traditional” forms of media such as films and the Internet.

What I created was a PowerPoint presentation that I’m really proud of completing. Not only was I proud to complete this in a PowerPoint format, since I’m such a dinosaur I rarely ever use this format, but I also had the opportunity to highlight amazing people in my community and whom I know personally and introduce their work to folks who have yet to hear of them. I included folks who are some of the foremothers of Latina Feminist thought (or using a gendered lens to examine and theorize about our lives and experiences), such as Gloria Anzaldúa, and Maxine Baca Zinn. I also introduced some of my amazing friends and media makers such as Erika Lopez, Sofia Quintero, and Ivan Velez, Jr. (interviews with them for the Media Makers Salon coming soon!). And yes, that’s right I had a whole discussion of including Latino men as being important to theorizing using a gendered lens. What I’m most proud of is to have had the opportunity to include youth media makers in the 2010 decade. I put Espie Hernandez, who was the first person I interviewed for the Media Makers Salon, and her documentary MARIPOSA. Espie’s film makes a really important connection between the topics that we are still discussing and needing to change as a community: gender roles and expectations, sexual orientation, gender expression, and Latino identity. Espie’s documentary and Anzaldúa’s work are in conversation with one another in amazing ways.

Prior to finishing my presentation, I outlined areas that I think Latina Feminist Thought will move towards and some areas that we still need to create spaces to discuss. Several of the conversations that I believe we need to be having and for whatever reason we are not, is including youth in theorizing their own experiences without having to have an adult “approve” or deem appropriate their narrative/testimonio. There was one theorist who I discussed that examines the Internet and how it is used to create activism and community (several reasons to support Net Neutrality), but who also sees several flaws in using the Internet for such work. I shared that this is one area that I find young people’s work being isolated and seen as less than exceptional which is not creating a space for future discussions with them. I also discussed including trans people of Color and examining how we create an atmosphere and environment that makes it difficult for trans people to live safely, share their ideas and experiences, and have the same rights we expect to have for ourselves.

Finally, I discussed how we could theorize about silence. I find that silence is something we are told is bad and negative and as Audre Lorde wrote “your silence will not protect you.” Yet, how is silence something that is very important and that represents us doing some really important and hard work? Let’s admit that thinking is hard work sometimes! Also, how can silence save some of our lives? Silence is very complicated and I think it needs to be examined more seriously and in a comprehensive way.

Below is the slide show that I compiled that you can check out and share if you’d like. I created a Latina Feminist Thought Tumblr page for folks to manage and submit anything they like to the page and encourage you to do the same!

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Femme-Macho & Virgin-Whore Dichotomy circa 2004

I enjoy looking back at what I wrote in my blog over these past 5 years. There's a lot of growth that I can see and there is also a lot of similarities that I see remaining. This is exciting for me. I started writing online in 2004. Here's one of the first entries I ever published. Lots of ideas here; kind of incoherent at times, but important thought processes occurring.


Virgin/Whore Dichotomy?!

why am i and my latina homegirls plagued by the virgin/whore dichotomy!? why must we be seen as either sex feigns or virginal? what about women who buy into this only to say "i'm neither, i'm in the middle"? am i really a femme-macho for now. don't know what that is? check out aida hurtado's the color of privilege three blasphemies on race and feminism. hurtado defines a femme-macho as one who: unlike the virgin or the whore, can either be attractive or unattractive. A strong personality is what characterizes her. The strength of the femme-macho does not lie in her racial/physical appearance but, rather, on remaining emotionally uninvolved though sexually active.

The man’s challenge is to deflower the femme-macho emotionally. "The femme-macho can be sarcastic, funny, outrageous, aggressive, mean, or belligerent, but she cannot be tender, loving (except in a political or abstract sense), frightened, or insecure (p. 50-51). This description is in some ways liberating and in others restricting. A woman who chooses not to give up her ability to enjoy herself sexually, can only do so at the cost of not experiencing an emotional relationship with her partner(s).

The issue of fluidity comes into play when Hurtado states that the “femme-macho also plays with the notion of bisexuality” (p. 51). Identities such as bisexuality have not been discussed in Latina feminist literature, or queer literature, as much as lesbianism has. Hurtado used her discussion of femme-machos to discuss lesbianism in the Chicano community. In Gloria Anzaldúa’s book Borderland/La Frontera, she discusses her perspectives on the Chicano community and her lesbianism. Anzaldúa writes “I made the choice to be queer (for some it is genetically inherent)” (emphasis Anzaldúa’s) (p. 41). Her statement to be queer speaks to her conscious decision to challenge stereotypes about women and the relationships they are capable of having and their positioning on the hierarchy Hurtado discusses.

Emma Pérez writes that the “arguments that men pass down to white women are passed down to us. We are forced to address issues as they define them, not as we define them. Our work reconstructs as much as it has always deconstructed the white-male order and white-feminist assumptions about women of color” (1991, p. 161). If anything, the virgin/whore dichotomy is not a Latino construct, it is a white one, along with ideas of machismo and Marianismo. The theories are backwards.

In Puerto Rico, traditional sexuality and relationship formation does not mean sexual oppression, traditional means historically known, autonomous, liberated sexuality, and oppressive and rigid sexuality and relationship formation is historically known to be a construction of colonizer’s “white” sexuality. The idea that Puerto Rican women, when sexually active, having more than one partner in their lifetime, and cohabitating with a partner, is not a result of acculturation to US society, but is actually a result of historical “traditional” Puerto Rican ways of living, loving and creating social support systems.

Attempts all racial/ethnic researchers, scholars, authors and others make to identify Latinas, especially Puerto Rican women’s, sexuality and relationships as dichotomous in a virgin/whore situation is inaccurate. I perceive this attempt to be a “new” and “modern” form of colonization of Puerto Rican women. Neocolonization doesn’t occur too far from “home,” and this example of Puerto Rico demonstrates that point.

I believe that it is appropriate to end this paper with a quote by Anzaldua. In her section “somos una gente” (we are one) she writes “I think we need to allow whites to be our allies…They will come to see that they are not helping us but following our lead” (p. 107). What is currently considered “liberated” white acculturated sexuality does not help Puerto Rican women and some Latinas, it is Puerto Rican women and Latinas helping liberate white sexuality.

I would rely on the memory of my mother telling me that I should live with a man for at least one year before marrying him. When I asked her why she said that, she responded that it was something she wished she had done before marrying my father (they have been separated for 10 years), that people change and that I will change and that I have to be aware and prepared for those changes before I get married and/or choose to share my life with someone.

Clearly, my Puerto Rican mother supports cohabitation and advocates it, she uses her own experiences to guide me towards a better understanding of my relationships and sexuality in hopes that I come to realizations about who I am and what I want, deserve, desire and need before I make life changing commitments. I believe this is her guiding me to creating and achieving what Chela Sandoval calls “revolutionary love.” June 8, 2004: 7:13 pm